Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,153
» Latest member: BAJR
» Forum threads: 4,060
» Forum posts: 4,408
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 211 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 211 Guest(s)
|
Latest Threads |
cIFA does it again (or ra...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
14th November 2017, 09:14 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 13,300
|
Genetic analysis of old b...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
30th August 2017, 10:32 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 10,219
|
What would eh know about ...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
15th July 2017, 01:37 PM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 19,989
|
How can adequate developm...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Dinosaur
10th July 2017, 12:20 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 6,306
|
300,000 years ...Wow!
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
7th June 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,670
|
Is it an Arched trench or...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: GnomeKing
25th May 2017, 05:44 PM
» Replies: 43
» Views: 46,539
|
Three Word Days
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
25th May 2017, 01:06 PM
» Replies: 598
» Views: 300,182
|
myfile
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Marc Berger
12th April 2017, 09:52 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 11,560
|
Recover your password
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: Wax
10th April 2017, 09:54 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 27,776
|
International Heritage Vi...
Forum: The Site Hut
Last Post: BAJR
31st March 2017, 10:29 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,707
|
|
|
Taking responsibility for yourselves |
Posted by: BAJR Host - 23rd June 2006, 07:57 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (2)
|
|
So m'dears.... after 6 years, BAJR has now made it to the lofty heights of the place to put adverts... and boy if you knew the phone calls, the prodding, the requests and cajouling that goes on behind the scenes... (yeah I know I miss the odd dodgy advert [:I] )
Anyway, after nearly 1500 adverts BAJR now places adverts for over 100 companies, and all have to adhere to the pay scales..(sometimes its the best deal I can get - sometimes I still say no... hey... I would rather lose an advert than put up one that falls below)
Now its up to you....
I want to know (offlist !!! Email me here if there are companies that pay less than the minimums...(and yes I want dates, job title, responsibility expected)
REMEMBER ...OFFLIST!! I want NO NAMES on these pages.
I also want to ask people to seriously consider - If I work for a company that pays below... I am perpetuating these wage levels... If I refuse to work for anything less than minum - then I am supporting BAJR... supporting the IFA... and making sure we ALL get the chance to have payscales that we deserve...
Think about it... BAJR has been doing what it can for years now...but I am only one person - what can you do??? :face-huh:
Another day another WSI?
|
|
|
county mountie job |
Posted by: Oxbeast - 21st June 2006, 09:38 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (7)
|
|
I was just browsing in the paper, and found an ad for county archaeologist, biggish county down south. I was really surprised at how little experience they were asking for: "four years' working experience of archaeology in the public, private or voluntary sectors".
Four years! Not enough to make supervisor in most places. I appreciate that most applicants will have more than four years experience, particularly as it mentions "a good knowledge of government and planning procedures"
But this is big money, why can't they ask for eight or ten years?
Why are they even mentioning the voluntary sector, I can't imagine you'd learn any useful skills there. Also, no mention of IFA membership, which you'd think would be valued at this level.
Sorry about the rant, and I mean nothing personally against curator types. I just wonder who comes up with these job adverts, and whether they are really looking for the best candidates.
|
|
|
Contemporary Archaeology |
Posted by: Paul Belford - 21st June 2006, 05:51 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (17)
|
|
I have mentioned the subject of 'contemporary archaeology' on this site before. We at Ironbridge are now involved with a specific contemporary archaeology project, the archaeological 'excavation' of the old archaeology transit van. The details of this project (along with some of our own comments about its usefulness) can be found on our contemporary archaeology blog.
I would be very interested in your responses to this project. Before you respond please have a look at the Draft Project Design which is now available on the Ironbridge website. So, the question is...
How worthwhile is the project to 'excavate' the archaeology van?
|
|
|
Learn to Poll |
Posted by: BAJR Host - 20th June 2006, 07:06 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (1)
|
|
You should now all have the ability to create a poll.
click NEW poll, once I have checked to see if it is clean and proper.. your poll will be up....
Another day another WSI?
|
|
|
Bats and Birds |
Posted by: Cautionary Tale - 19th June 2006, 03:58 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (13)
|
|
Have just had two very similar conversations with two ecologists regarding alterations to Listed Buildings.
Without wishing to make it too site specific, the question revolved around the issue of whether alterations could be made to make a Listed Building either more suitable or create an environment which might encourage wildlife use. The structures currently have little or no use in one case. The question of initial damge may be quite easily overcome (for some bats access points can be made by the removal of 2-3cm sections of mortar) so I am fairly comfortable with at least explaining that the effect on the outside of the structure will be minimal and visually almost neutral. What I am less certain about is the measure of long term impact of bats or birds on the building itself. Has anyone received LBC application covering something like this (would a maintainance plan by best produced?) or would curators see this as generally outside the bounds of LBC?
Of the Clan Sutton
|
|
|
sloppy,unprofessional and contrived? |
Posted by: troll - 19th June 2006, 03:43 PM - Forum: The Site Hut
- Replies (35)
|
|
There seems to be a new fad.Some units seem to be quite happy to go hunting for features through 20-odd cms of overburden rather than open the site up properly.I understand that this approach would be rewarding in a budgetry sense but, I do hope that this is not going to become the norm...tiz nauseating particularly as two recent examples of this were sanctioned/dictated by consultants and was completely overlooked by curators.Whats going on?[?]
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
|
|
|
|