16th August 2008, 11:07 AM
Well... by a BIG margin, the award goes to Jean and her http://www.buildinghistory.org site.
will have to start making a list of sites...
congrads.
For my part, it is the depth of information available, when dealing with such a subject it can be easy to get lost, but simplicity is often the best path. It is true about serif/san serif - however, for shear bursting at the seams joy. It has to be Building History.
Sorry to Orkneyjar - but never say never.
Poor show for Oxford. (would be intersting to know why)
So ... any thoughts about the next award... I kind of agree that it should be like for like type of sites...
SO!! New Media it is..
starting with - http://www.preservationtoday.com any other similar sites?
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers
will have to start making a list of sites...
congrads.
For my part, it is the depth of information available, when dealing with such a subject it can be easy to get lost, but simplicity is often the best path. It is true about serif/san serif - however, for shear bursting at the seams joy. It has to be Building History.
Sorry to Orkneyjar - but never say never.
Poor show for Oxford. (would be intersting to know why)
So ... any thoughts about the next award... I kind of agree that it should be like for like type of sites...
SO!! New Media it is..
starting with - http://www.preservationtoday.com any other similar sites?
"I don't have an archaeological imagination.."
Borekickers