2nd April 2009, 05:11 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by drpeterwardle
Definitely Not.
What on earth has this got to do with Town and Country Planning.
And based upon a false premis. There is no difference in the temp and permmie terms and condition. Neither receive living expenses when working at their usual places of work.
What developers pay for staff is matter for them. ?Putting out 3 diggers and claiming for supervisors? is nothing to do with curators.
David I suggest you re-read PPG 16 and the relevant sentence actually uses the word OR not and. It also says Professionally qualified not appropriate.
Peter
I'm not sure I follow large parts of David's question/argument but I do find "?Putting out 3 diggers and claiming for supervisors? is nothing to do with curators" quite questionable. Since the briefs I regularly see say something along the lines of work must be carried out by appropriately qualified and experienced contractors putting out three new graduates when it should be three POs I would definitely consider a matter for a curator to be concerned with.
Perhaps next time I'll cost for a PO and two assistants and instead send a monkey, two dogs, and a parrot and see what they say! Perhaps at half time I substitute them all for Peter Crouch and John Terry. I'm sure the curator wouldn't mind.
I would also assume that 'professionally qualified' means 'has some actual experience' rather than 'in first year of joint archaeology and media studies BA, and probably looking for a job at ITV', but that's just me.