2nd April 2009, 05:26 PM
I'm not quite sure that I follow this bit, David:
"ie... Permanent Staff and Temp staff are treated equally... and temp staff are made aware that accommodation and subs would be taxed... as it is not a benefit, while permemnant staff would not have that taxed as it is a benefit."
How can curators require that contractors provide this? Seems a bit outside their remit. And while dr wardle is completely correct when he says "Neither receive living expenses when working at their usual places of work", I do think that a curator should make it his business if they are being lied to about who is actually carrying out the work. For one thing, it is an attempt to defraud the client.
"ie... Permanent Staff and Temp staff are treated equally... and temp staff are made aware that accommodation and subs would be taxed... as it is not a benefit, while permemnant staff would not have that taxed as it is a benefit."
How can curators require that contractors provide this? Seems a bit outside their remit. And while dr wardle is completely correct when he says "Neither receive living expenses when working at their usual places of work", I do think that a curator should make it his business if they are being lied to about who is actually carrying out the work. For one thing, it is an attempt to defraud the client.