26th May 2009, 04:32 PM
agreed on a landscape perspective for the volume of material and machine time involved often determines the most cost effective point at which to dig things so many times to expose whatever.
remeber that archaeologists are often termed as stupid for not knowing what is there before we go in.
kettle and pot come to mind
the fact remains that your askin about an 'acting' proffession in regards to a 're-active' situaltional practicality.
the only problem then s that whoever runs the job will need to have the ability to deal with the potential stress and spiralling costsin a manner by which they can justify a certain standard for the body of work produced.
and where hat comes in is from people who really know what they are doing and have been around long enough to have thought about it and their staff to go right. The staff need to have faith in that people are trying their best, while they try and fullfill the tasks they are set by their bosses.
Mike
the balances maybe
Mike
txt is
Mike