28th November 2005, 10:24 AM
I am sure that there is a world of difference between the 'private views' of the CBA management and views expressed on the Britarch discussion list.
Even though the Britarch list is managed by the CBA is has the same relationship with it as BAJR Forum does to our Mr. Host. In other words the CBA is not responsible for the comments placed on there, any more than BAJR is responsible for mine or anyone elses comments placed here.
The Britarch list does seem to be populated by even wierder people than live here. Yes BAJR might have its share of left-wing loonies but they are quite harmless compared to some of the nutters on Britarch. That's why I am here and not there.
Incidentally I think the IFA and probably the CBA are aware of many of the concerns re wages, career structure etc. that are often raised on BAJR and do seem to be doing something about it, albeit slowly.
Don't be discouraged Mr Host, I am sure your behind the scenes discussions are not going to be de-railed by the comments of some list members (either on Britarch or on BAJR).
Even though the Britarch list is managed by the CBA is has the same relationship with it as BAJR Forum does to our Mr. Host. In other words the CBA is not responsible for the comments placed on there, any more than BAJR is responsible for mine or anyone elses comments placed here.
The Britarch list does seem to be populated by even wierder people than live here. Yes BAJR might have its share of left-wing loonies but they are quite harmless compared to some of the nutters on Britarch. That's why I am here and not there.
Incidentally I think the IFA and probably the CBA are aware of many of the concerns re wages, career structure etc. that are often raised on BAJR and do seem to be doing something about it, albeit slowly.
Don't be discouraged Mr Host, I am sure your behind the scenes discussions are not going to be de-railed by the comments of some list members (either on Britarch or on BAJR).