29th November 2005, 03:00 PM
Quote:quote:CBA, IFA and Britarch = people who generally think that archaeology is in a reasonable state of health and only minor change is needed.(posted by Real Job)
BAJR = people who generally think that awful wages+contracts, poor health and safety, and unresolved issues at the heart of the profession mean that lots of change is needed.
If that is a fair characterisation (if...) then I know who I support
I would characterise them all rather differently:
CBA - archaeology pressure group dominated by 'establishment' figures;
IFA - a professional institution trying to represent all parts of the profession (a thankless task, as everyone thinks that everything is their fault, especially when they have nothing to do with it);
Britarch - a discussion forum for looney tunes;
BAJR - a more serious discussion forum trying to address important issues, with a largely grassroots, bottom-up character.
I would say that the CBA, IFA and BAJR all need each other and none of them could achieve as much as they do if the others didn't exist.
I am sure that Britarch is important to its participants, but I can't say I'd notice if it disappeared.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished