19th February 2006, 11:51 AM
Gretings all and welcome to the forum Ladyjen! I think my isue here is that whilst the frames of reference offered by Muddy provide categories-I don`t think that we have identified just what it is that makes either the "best" or "worst" archaeologist. Just what makes a good field archaeologist for example? Just what is it that makes a bad one?
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)
..knowledge without action is insanity and action without knowledge is vanity..(imam ghazali,ayyuhal-walad)