23rd June 2006, 02:08 PM
1m1d is correct here - it is the quality of experience rather than the quantity that is important.
In terms of career development within public sector archaeology it might seem that there is a logical progression from SMR officer through DC officer to CAO. This might work OK given sufficient in-house training but it would be misleading to expect an SMR officer to move easily into DC work unless thay have a decent amount of fieldwork experience.
Beamo
In terms of career development within public sector archaeology it might seem that there is a logical progression from SMR officer through DC officer to CAO. This might work OK given sufficient in-house training but it would be misleading to expect an SMR officer to move easily into DC work unless thay have a decent amount of fieldwork experience.
Beamo