7th March 2010, 05:46 PM
This has been one of the most tricky, arguementative and though provoking topics for a while (unionisation excepting of course)
It does make you consider what is 'right' and what is acceptable, where does the intrusion of work into personal stop? does it ever?
and of course, the selectivity of drugs testing..
A driver to site and back I may consider, IF there ws some sort of reasonable cause. not just for randomness (it erodes trust)
A person who actually operates heavy machinary (and that is a tiny tiny percentage in archaeology)
but seriously... a trowel weilding (chance would be a fine thing on a site like the ones that needs drugs testing) digger who had a spliff or two at the weekend... ?? to what purpose or end does that serve?
on the other hand...
and thus I go on... seeing merit in both... strong arguements for both and no end to the cycle...
It does make you consider what is 'right' and what is acceptable, where does the intrusion of work into personal stop? does it ever?
and of course, the selectivity of drugs testing..
A driver to site and back I may consider, IF there ws some sort of reasonable cause. not just for randomness (it erodes trust)
A person who actually operates heavy machinary (and that is a tiny tiny percentage in archaeology)
but seriously... a trowel weilding (chance would be a fine thing on a site like the ones that needs drugs testing) digger who had a spliff or two at the weekend... ?? to what purpose or end does that serve?
on the other hand...
and thus I go on... seeing merit in both... strong arguements for both and no end to the cycle...