3rd June 2010, 08:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 3rd June 2010, 09:02 PM by trowelfodder.)
Completed the survey but have to admit that i feel that a number of the questions are specificaly tailored to provide the answered wanted by the questionaure writer - particularly those concerning maternity rights by stating what is comparable for other industries - if you were not aware of this fact before answering the question i think many would answer differently
And why do you wish to include time spent in univeristy in the experience section as you skew the results - new/more recent graduates are more likely to be unemployed
More women than men are likely to be affected by ressession lay offs but this is not specificaly a gender issue. It has already been shown that a disproporionate number of women leave the proffession in their thirtys, and given that women outnumber men in the early years of their careers then surely this can be the only outcome as it is those at the lower level who will be laid off in greater numbers as they exist in greater numbers.
From the wordings I feel you have already made your decisions and are now setting out to gain the data to support it
And why do you wish to include time spent in univeristy in the experience section as you skew the results - new/more recent graduates are more likely to be unemployed
More women than men are likely to be affected by ressession lay offs but this is not specificaly a gender issue. It has already been shown that a disproporionate number of women leave the proffession in their thirtys, and given that women outnumber men in the early years of their careers then surely this can be the only outcome as it is those at the lower level who will be laid off in greater numbers as they exist in greater numbers.
From the wordings I feel you have already made your decisions and are now setting out to gain the data to support it