16th December 2010, 10:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 16th December 2010, 10:35 PM by GnomeKing.)
well said odin
while commercial archaeology may have functioned over x-amount of years, the many topics discussed here in this forum are testament to the situation being far from desirable.
in particular the opportunities to create a progressive profession for the future have been almost entirely wasted, 9/10 directly because of competitive tendering.
i am glad at least somebody can see beyond the end of their trowel, pen, or nose
@Milton : re FIU ; i refer to the attitude that is demonstrated towards expertise. i regard myself as a highly trained and experienced professional - perhaps you do not...
(its not front line - we can lose it, no one will notice).
Are you seriously suggesting that competitive tendering will improve the reliability and objectivity of forensic crime investigation?
Anyway i am glad you seem to share my concern (Forensic being dead important and all) - i expect you will be protesting vocaly about then?
(oh welcome BTW)
while commercial archaeology may have functioned over x-amount of years, the many topics discussed here in this forum are testament to the situation being far from desirable.
in particular the opportunities to create a progressive profession for the future have been almost entirely wasted, 9/10 directly because of competitive tendering.
i am glad at least somebody can see beyond the end of their trowel, pen, or nose
@Milton : re FIU ; i refer to the attitude that is demonstrated towards expertise. i regard myself as a highly trained and experienced professional - perhaps you do not...
(its not front line - we can lose it, no one will notice).
Are you seriously suggesting that competitive tendering will improve the reliability and objectivity of forensic crime investigation?
Anyway i am glad you seem to share my concern (Forensic being dead important and all) - i expect you will be protesting vocaly about then?
(oh welcome BTW)