26th May 2011, 10:03 AM
Dear unhinged lunatic guest, poor you, you have been subject to a depraved and loathsome tendering process and in the name of archaeology. I cant imagine the corner of hell that you inhabit right now. Mortal combat with five others, bish bash and its all over in a day. You are probably flagellating yourself over yours and the others standards. How much did it cost you (and the others)? Is this something that the gang of fours consultants have to consider.
But wait how can this be in this day and age when the number of the beast is pps5. I cant find any mention of the word tender or brief in it. All it does is go on about
From this my dear Watson I surmise that the Dear unhinged lunatic guest was involved in a tender to provide evidence with the application.
Is that right Dear unhinged lunatic guest or were you and your curators stuck in some bygone paradigm which possibly is what this odd consultation whitewash is about. Thing is- is it to change the paradigm or bring the new one on.
But wait how can this be in this day and age when the number of the beast is pps5. I cant find any mention of the word tender or brief in it. All it does is go on about
Quote:[SIZE=3]Policy HE6: Information requirements for applications for consent affecting ..
[/SIZE]
Quote:[SIZE=3]Local planning authorities should not validate applications where the extent of the impact of the proposal on the significance of any heritage assets affected cannot adequately be understood from the application and supporting documents.
[/SIZE]
Quote:[SIZE=3]Policy HE7: Policy principles guiding (woggle) the determination of applications for consent relating to all heritage assets
[/SIZE]
Quote:[SIZE=3]In decision-making local planning authorities should seek to identify and assess
the particular significance of any element of the historic environment that may be
affected by the relevant proposal (including by development affecting the setting of
a heritage asset) taking account of:
(i) evidence provided with the application
[/SIZE]
From this my dear Watson I surmise that the Dear unhinged lunatic guest was involved in a tender to provide evidence with the application.
Is that right Dear unhinged lunatic guest or were you and your curators stuck in some bygone paradigm which possibly is what this odd consultation whitewash is about. Thing is- is it to change the paradigm or bring the new one on.
Reason: your past is my past