26th May 2011, 11:12 AM
Unitof1 Wrote:Is it a conspiracy -maybe. The need to get a consultancy to establish what has been enshrined has not only come from ify but also algao, eh and hs-but not cadw, manx nh niea. Lets not call it a conspiracy but a meeting or possibly a series of meetings, tea and biscuits. Lets imagine how the meeting or meetings of the gang of four came about, lets imagine the agenda, the corium, those that sat under two hats, the time table, train tickets? Lets understand where the funding came from -13500 /X x pifa fees. Is there for instance a mutuality between hsh and eh, two different trove laws united as one. Why do they need a consultancy, cant algao do it. Who objected to an in house approach. Do they want an appearance of independence. Has the candidate already been selected. How does ify select. More committees with two hats.
transparent to the outside user. not like pss5 which is only just a year old and ppg16 is not yet dead (which is what the consultants will say causes the discrepancies) its about that time when the pension-grabbers to make work for other pension-grabbers by creating a cushy publicly-funded non-job, all designed to make life even more difficult for the Only Real Archaeologist In The World (him)
http://www.eldc.gov.uk/planning/AcolNetC...key=107226
yes thats potentialy three different discharge charges pension grabbers
ah tis the illuminati and the phoebus cartel all over again - so you wont be applying then my little Slothrop?