26th March 2012, 10:34 AM
differentcolourmud Wrote:I can see an argument for the financial check, obviously you don't want a sites publication screwed because a company goes bust.
Shame nothing can apparently be done regarding developers going bust and therefore resulting in the publication being screwed. How many million times has that happened? If they are going to maintain lists, why not also a list of developers who have the financial clout to see the project through to the end? And a list of ones who are known to have evaded their responsibilities in the past.