7th May 2014, 08:56 PM
Marc Berger Wrote:Possibly they should be named in the wsi if not co-authors of it.
Maybe Mike/Wax employment rights don't stack up for anybody who calls themselves an archaeologist working on a site which has a finite life expectancy. there has always been place of work, travel to site and travel time to site conflicts. Keep working the self employed route, it's not bogus so long as you hold on to the fact that no one else can produce your archaeology. It would be interesting to See Hmrc turn that argument around.
I wasn't being serious about the self employed work being bogus. I've worked several times as self employed under similar conditions as stipulated in the controversial advert and as far as the HMRC was concerned it was legit and yes I was actually self employed, I'm guessing they know more about it than anyone. I actually managed to make some money, paid my tax and NIC's and enjoyed it more than being stuck on a payroll.