15th October 2008, 02:47 PM
Invisible man, surely a company (who may be an RAO, for all we know) who permits the unrecorded destruction of archaeological deposits, fails to follow their WSI and misinforms the curator is very much a matter for the IFA.
If you really think that it is not their concern; what is the point of even having standards and guidance? When should they get concerned?
If you really think that it is not their concern; what is the point of even having standards and guidance? When should they get concerned?