2nd March 2007, 08:55 PM
Are there any situations where "archaeology" and the archaeological planning system should be ignored or given an easy ride?
I am not talking about proper sites but the very marginal decisions where it is unlikely that anything is there. PPG16 says grants should for example be available for charities but they are not.
Clearly that can be no return to an expectation that diggers work for free for long periods of time.
Should we have archaid where archaeologists donate their services on socially good projects?
There is a charity called planning aid which does just that for the planning system.
Many of the big Units are in fact charities surely they should be willing to take on such projects?
I have a specific BIG PROJECT in mind, the opening ceremony was two days ago, so in line with the AUP I canât identify it fully. The curator was curator like but if they had done a bit of research then the need for a planning condition would have been removed or they could have done the watching brief themselves.
In the said town, home to a university department, a few consultancies and contractors, and the IFA, within the catchment of the two big charity units, within twenty miles of loads more consultancies; it fell to me to help out, together with another small private sector company.
If any of the other managers consultants or even the ifa staff would like to donate to a project building flats for the homeless in their home town they can still do so
http://www.bigproject.info/donations.htm
Dr Peter
Where am I?
What motorway are on?
Are we on the M4 yet?
I am not talking about proper sites but the very marginal decisions where it is unlikely that anything is there. PPG16 says grants should for example be available for charities but they are not.
Clearly that can be no return to an expectation that diggers work for free for long periods of time.
Should we have archaid where archaeologists donate their services on socially good projects?
There is a charity called planning aid which does just that for the planning system.
Many of the big Units are in fact charities surely they should be willing to take on such projects?
I have a specific BIG PROJECT in mind, the opening ceremony was two days ago, so in line with the AUP I canât identify it fully. The curator was curator like but if they had done a bit of research then the need for a planning condition would have been removed or they could have done the watching brief themselves.
In the said town, home to a university department, a few consultancies and contractors, and the IFA, within the catchment of the two big charity units, within twenty miles of loads more consultancies; it fell to me to help out, together with another small private sector company.
If any of the other managers consultants or even the ifa staff would like to donate to a project building flats for the homeless in their home town they can still do so
http://www.bigproject.info/donations.htm
Dr Peter
Where am I?
What motorway are on?
Are we on the M4 yet?