4th July 2013, 03:23 PM
sorry in advance to have a go Gnomeking I don't think that reports or archives are important. It seems to me that it is the archaeology which should make the report or archive important if anybody thinks that it is worthwhile to produce them. Important archaeology is something that is worth owning and over which criticisms can be made. Everything else is vanity and economically unsustainable. Nobody whats your reports or put it more bluntly nobody will pay you any money for them I can guarantee you that 99% of all reports ever attempted if tossed in a bin will not make a difference to anybody.
Work is all about getting paid to do something. The system we have at the moment makes it possible to attempt to screw money out of a developer before they can develop but once that field work is out of the way the rest is vanity. Thing is you want to base chartering and the whole point of the ifa on monitoring. What I would agree to is a system which once you have joined allows you to do what you want. Like once you qualify as a doctor you can prescribe drugs to your clients. If you want to go around producing most excellent reports out of a load of old rubbish please don't drag me into it.
Work is all about getting paid to do something. The system we have at the moment makes it possible to attempt to screw money out of a developer before they can develop but once that field work is out of the way the rest is vanity. Thing is you want to base chartering and the whole point of the ifa on monitoring. What I would agree to is a system which once you have joined allows you to do what you want. Like once you qualify as a doctor you can prescribe drugs to your clients. If you want to go around producing most excellent reports out of a load of old rubbish please don't drag me into it.
Reason: your past is my past