Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2009
16% seems high, but what about the possibility that the IFA may not be taking polls from companies not registered with them and more-over the number of diggers that are not IFA members. The latter, i fear, are the actual and real majority. On occasion the IFA could only represent the vocal minority and the real figure for unemployed archaeologists could be much higher.
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2006
Quote:quote:Originally posted by Segovax
16% seems high, but what about the possibility that the IFA may not be taking polls from companies not registered with them and more-over the number of diggers that are not IFA members. The latter, i fear, are the actual and real majority. On occasion the IFA could only represent the vocal minority and the real figure for unemployed archaeologists could be much higher.
I can't remember..... Was the 16% redundancies, layoffs or based on the number of people working vs the same last year?
And was the 16% on top of the losses last year or did they include them?
Whatever, I'm one of them!
Posts: 0
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2004
May BAJR Survey of Contractors (representing around 1000 archaeologists)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/15470511/BAJR-...vey-May-09
available online..
short and sweet and showing some possible signs of the positives.
"Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage."
Niccolo Machiavelli
